Friday, May 10, 2019

California Psychologist and Doctor Charged with Fraudulent Workers’ Compensation Evaluations Where Psychologist Was Not Certified as a Qualified Medical Examiner and Doctor's Certification Had Lapsed


In billing for evaluations of workers' compensation patients, health care providers should be very careful to ensure that they do not misrepresent themselves as a certified  Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) on a medical legal evaluation or billing statement. 

In addition, it is important to ensure that the bills for medical legal expenses have been reviewed so that the criteria for medical-legal billing has been met. A recent case shows how a report by two provider who were not properly certified QMEs led to criminal insurance fraud charges. 

On May 7, 2019, psychologist Danita Stewart and Dr. Catalino Dureza were charged for allegedly submitting fraudulent insurance claims for Medical Legal Evaluations. They are presumed innocent and charges are not evidence.

Dr. Stewart, a licensed psychologist, allegedly submitted 36 fraudulent insurance claims between April 2015 and June 2015 to five different insurers for Medical Legal Evaluations for a total of $90,714. A Medical Legal Evaluation is conducted to evaluate an employee’s work-related injury and is governed by the California Labor Code. 

Even though Dr. Stewart was a licensed psychologist she was not certified as a Qualified Medical Examiner as required to conduct and bill for Medical Legal Evaluations. Dr. Stewart allegedly conducted these fraudulent evaluations at clinics in Fresno, Tulare, and Kern Counties. Dr. Stewart was charged with 36 felony counts of Penal Code Section 550(a)(1) [one for each report], and 1 felony count of Penal Code Section 550(a)(7).

Dr. Dureza, a licensed medical doctor, had obtained the proper certification to conduct and bill for Medical Legal Evaluations, but his certification lapsed. Dr. Dureza allegedly continued to conduct and bill for Medical Legal Evaluations, and once he was recertified he conducted and billed for unauthorized Medical Legal Evaluations. Between January 2014 and May 2015, Dr. Dureza allegedly submitted 17 fraudulent insurance claims for Medical Legal Evaluations conducted in Fresno County to five different insurers for a total of $16,292. This is not a large loss amount but shows that they will prosecute for amounts under $25,000. Dr. Dureza was charged with 17 felony counts of Insurance Code 1871.4(a)(1).

Whether or not someone is a QME is a public record so it appears the insurance carriers must claim that they paid these bills understanding that the providers were CMEs. I have seen cases where a biller has placed a QME, IME and AME near the providers' name, not realizing that there could be confusion on what type of report is being billed. The carriers have been aggressive about billings for these reports even though the providers could have billed for treatment without a QME certification.

Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.



DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.