Friday, September 28, 2018

Former California Medical Doctor Sentenced To Over Three Years In Prison For Unlawfully Prescribing Oxycodone to a Patient. Judge Noted Doctor Did Not Run a Pill Mill But Feeding One Patient's "Habit" Is Enough.


Previously, only physicians who went far over the line and ran "pill mills" got targeted for prosecution. Times have changed. One recent case shows a prosecution for a prescription of opioids to a single patient over a couple of years who was an addict. That patient died and local police declined to file charges so federal charges were brought on the prescribing.

On September 18, 2018, former California physician Christopher Owens was sentenced to 41 months in prison for unlawfully prescribing oxycodone hydrochloride without a medical purpose. The sentence was handed down by the Judge Alsup, U.S. District Judge in San Francisco, California.

The former Dr. Owens pleaded guilty on March 20, 2018.  In sentencing Dr. Owens, Judge Alsup stated, “[Owens] was not running a pill mill, . . . but he was doing something just as bad . . ..  He used that prescription pad to feed a habit.”  

Dr. Owens acknowledged he prescribed the drugs without a legitimate medical need and outside of the course of medical practice.  
According to his open plea application filed with the court, Dr. Owens of Indianapolis, Indiana was a medical doctor when he prescribed oxycodone hydrochloride, a Schedule II controlled substance, to an individual. His guilty plea came after an Indictment. On July 11, 2017, a federal grand jury indicted Dr. Owens charging him with distributing oxycodone without a medical need, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).  

In addition to the prison term, Judge Alsup ordered Owens to serve three years of supervised release to begin after his prison term is completed and a $7,500 fine. Judge Alsup ordered Owens to surrender and begin serving his sentence on December 3, 2018.  As a consequence of the issues in this case, Dr. Owens lost his license to practice medicine.

 

Sunday, September 2, 2018

Sentencing Update: California Doctor Sentenced To 63 Months In Federal Prison For Health Care Fraud. Doctor's Testimony At Trial Resulted in Longer Sentence. Doctor Husband Sentenced to One Year and One Day. Case Is On Appeal.


In federal court, one important issue is whether to testify or not testify. It is a more critical issue in federal court due to a federal judge's ability to increase the sentence for "obstruction" if the judge thinks the defendant misrepresented the truth. 

These same concerns are in state court but there is not usually the concern about the impact on sentencing. Instead there is the usual concern about making it appear that the burden of proof has shifted to the defense.

In a recent case, a doctor defendant received a harsh sentence based in part on the judge adding time for "obstruction" due to her testimony at trial.  On August 28, 2018, family practitioner Dr. Vilasini Ganesh was sentenced to 63 months in prison for health care fraud and making false statements related to a health care benefits program. We had reported on this case previously after the 8-week trial when she and her partner were convicted.

During Dr. Ganesh’s sentencing hearing, Judge Koh specifically stated that Dr. Ganesh  "obstructed justice" by misrepresenting her understanding of the legal system, the amount of money she was paid by insurers, and whether she understood that it was improper to “upcharge” when submitting claims to insurers. The jury had rejected a defense as well that the doctor's mental state contributed to her lack of understanding of the billing rules.

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.