A recent health care fraud case involved the alleged unlicensed practice of medicine and a physician allegedly posing as the owner of medical clinics in order to satisfy New York law that medical clinics be owned and operated by a medical professional. When that occurs the loss amounts can be large since the entire clinic can be viewed as a fraud with all billings suspect.
On May 9, 2019, after a six-week federal jury trial, doctor Paul J. Mathieu and physical therapist Hatem Behiry were each convicted of one count each of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud; and conspiracy to make false statements relating to a health care program; as well as the substantive offenses of health care fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. This trial was held in the Southern District of New York.
Between
2007 and 2013, the government alleged that Dr. Mathieu fraudulently posed as the owner of three of six medical
clinics in Brooklyn (the “Clinics”), which were all in fact owned by a non-physician and alleged co-conspirator Alexksandr Burman. Mr. Burman has already been sentenced in a related case to 120 months in prison.
The government alleged that from 2009 to 2013, Dr. Mathieu also directly participated in the fraudulent billing practices of the clinics, by visiting several of the clinics on a weekly basis, where he would sign stacks of false and fraudulent medical charts, and issue referrals for expensive additional testing, occupational therapy, and physical therapy, including for physical therapy purportedly provided by Mr. Behiry. It was alleged at trial that during this time period, Dr. Mathieu did not see any patients and simply fabricated medical records falsely stating that he had seen and treated such patients.
During that time period, the government claimed that the Clinics
fraudulently billed Medicare and Medicaid approximately $30 million for medical
services and supplies that were medically unnecessary and/or not provided.
It was alleged that Mr. Behiry participated in the fraudulent billing practices of the Clinics by
pretending to provide physical therapy to many of those same patients, most of
whom were receiving cash kickbacks for coming to the Clinics. In fact, the government alleged at trial that Mr. Behiry was engaged in an empty charade designed to create the appearance of
physical therapy, while almost no therapy was actually being provided to many
patients. Mr. Behiry was also alleged to have prepared and overseen the
preparation of a large number of false medical and billing records.
Among other things, Mr. Behiry allegedly completed thousands of fabricated reports, in
which patients were described almost identically, and with little or no regard
for actual medical conditions or needs. It was also alleged that many of the
charts were for patients whom Mr. Behiry and his team had not evaluated or provided
therapy to at all.
In
addition to his role in the Clinics, it was alleged that Dr. Mathieu also wrote unneeded prescriptions
for adult diapers and other incontinence products, which were filled at
Universal Supply Depot, a medical supply company also owned by Mr. Burman’s wife, Marina Burman who has already been sentenced to 36 months. The government brought out at trial that Dr. Mathieu throughout this period of the
fraud was regularly a top prescriber of adult diapers in the State of New
York.
In this case and the related cases, including Dr. Mathieu and PT Behiry a total of 15 people have either plead guilty or been convicted in this and related
cases. The other defendants includes two additional physicians (who each got 18 months), occupational therapists, bookkeeper, office managers, and business partners in an ambulette company.
Thoughts And Articles From Tracy Green, Attorney At Green and Associates, Who Represents Professionals, Businesses and Individuals In Administrative, Criminal Defense, Regulatory, Health Care and Civil Litigation Matters In California
DISCLAIMER
DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.