For the past five years, after the conviction of former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling was upheld at the U.S. Supreme Court, federal authorities have been getting ready to use "honest services" mail fraud in health care fraud and kickback cases involving private insurance, workers' compensation insurance as well as Medicare and Medicaid (Medi-Cal) billing.
In Skilling, the U.S. Supreme Court found clear congressional inent to limit honest services prosecutions to "offenders who, in violation of fiduciary duty, participated in bribery or kickback schemes." In state health care, physicians and chiropractors owe a general fiduciary and statutory duty as part of their professional duties to patients to disclose financial relationships they have with referring businesses (Bus. and Prof. Code Section 654.2) and this will be the core of the conspiracy count but the prosecutors have alleged specific violations of state law which prohibit unlawful referral arrangements for workers' compensation patients as well.
In three California cases filed this past week, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California (San Diego) is using honest services mail fraud (18 U.S.C. Section 1341 and 1346) and the travel act (18 U.S.C. Section 1952) to prosecute kickbacks and unlawful referral arrangements in treatment of California workers' compensation patients.
Apart from the fiduciary duty to patients, these honest services fraud cases are also using violation of the underlying California state laws that prohibit referring patients to providers or individuals where the referring person has a financial interest or relationship with them (Labor Code Sections 139.3 and 3125), and state laws that prohibit kickbacks or any compensation or inducement for referring patients (Bus. and Prof. Code Section 650 and Insurance Code 750).
In one of them filed in the Southern District of California on November 6, 2015, United States v. Reese, Mathis, et al., Case No. 15CR2822, charges were filed against:
(1) Chiropractor George Reese and his professional corporation,
(2) Foremost Shockwave Solutions, a shock wave therapy services company,
(3) Lee Mathis, a purported partial owner of Foremost who is also an attorney who allegedly owned management and/or billing companies that are referenced in the Indictment, and
(4) Fernando Valdes who is also a purported owner of Foremost.
Anyone charged is presumed innocent, and charges in an Indictment are not evidence.
Thoughts And Articles From Tracy Green, Attorney At Green and Associates, Who Represents Professionals, Businesses and Individuals In Administrative, Criminal Defense, Regulatory, Health Care and Civil Litigation Matters In California
Sunday, November 15, 2015
"Honest Services" Mail Fraud and Kickback Case: How The Feds Are Asserting Jurisction in Charging a Shockwave Therapy Company and its Purported Owners, a Referring Chiropractor, Unindicted Referring Doctors and Unindicted Marketers Over Workers' Compensation Patient Referrals and Alleged Kickbacks Disguised as Agreements for Billing, Rent, Receivables and/or Management Services
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Texas Home-Health Agency Owners, Director of Nursing And Marketers Indicted For Illegal Patient Marketing, Providing Unnecessary Services and $13 Million in Alleged Medicare Fraud
The health care fraud cases against home health and hospice owners continue to get filed in federal court. The most recent case is one in which the
owners, the director of nursing and patient recruiters of a home-health agency
based in Houston were arrested November 10, 2015 for their alleged roles in
conspiracies to defraud Medicare, to pay illegal healthcare kickbacks and to
commit money laundering in an Indictment filed in the Southern District of Texas.
According to the Indictment, Ebong Tilong and Marie Neba used the Texas-based, home-health agency that they owned to bill Medicare for home-health services that were not provided or not medically necessary.
The Indictment then alleges they orchestrated this scheme by paying kickbacks to a series of individuals as follows:
First, Tilong and Neba allegedly paid illegal kickbacks to physicians in exchange for authorizing medically unnecessary home-health services.
Second, using the money that Medicare paid for such alleged unnecessary or fraudulent claims, Tilong and Neba allegedly paid illegal kickbacks to marketers (patient recruiters) Daisy Carter and Connie Ray Island in exchange for referring Medicare beneficiaries for home-health services.
Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Millennium Health Laboratories Agrees to Pay $256 Million to Resolve Qui Tam Allegations of Unnecessary Urine Drug and Genetic Testing and Illegal Kickbacks to Physicians
Millennium
Health, formerly Millennium Laboratories, has agreed to pay $256 million to
resolve alleged violations of the False Claims Act for billing Medicare,
Medicaid and other federal health care programs for medically unnecessary urine
drug and genetic testing and for providing free items to physicians who agreed
to refer expensive laboratory testing business to Millennium.
The United States alleged that Millennium caused physicians to order excessive numbers of urine drug tests, in part through the promotion of “custom profiles,” which, instead of being tailored to individual patients, were in effect standing orders that caused physicians to order large number of tests without an individualized assessment of each patient’s needs.
The United States also alleged that Millennium’s provision of free point of care urine drug test cups to physicians—expressly conditioned on the physicians’ agreement to return the urine specimens to Millennium for hundreds of dollars’ worth of additional testing — violated the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute. The Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute generally prohibit laboratories from giving physicians anything of value in exchange for referrals of tests.
Millennium,
headquartered in San Diego, is one of the largest urine drug testing laboratories
in the United States and conducts business nationwide.
Monday, November 9, 2015
Pain Management Physicians' Treatment Plans And Records Are Being Reviewed With Great Scrutiny - How To Respond To Request For Records and Interview
Board certified pain management physicians are beginning to have records requested from the California Medical Board with greater frequency. In many cases, the Medical Board has requested them due to complaints from family members or pharmacists.
It is critical to be prepared and handle any requests for records or interviews with great care and seek expert attorney and expert witness review at the earliest time.
It is also important to review your office's systems and documentation standards now before any records are requested. Remember, if any complaint is made it is highly likely that records will be requested and patient charts are not usually perfectly documented and the standards
What You Can Learn From One Pain Management Physician's Medical Board Case.
Here is a sample case of a pain management physician that ended up in a Medical Board Accusation being filed against him for unprofessional conduct, gross negligence, repeated negligence, and excessively prescribing to a patient without a proper medical indication in violation of California Business and Profession Code Section 725, 2234(b)(c) or (d), and 2242(a) relating to several patients. This was a highly trained and regarded physician in the field of pain management.
How did this case end up as an Accusation and what can you do to avoid a similar situation?
1. Documentation Issues - Especially With Long Term Patients. The pain management physician had treated each of the patients for over ten (10) years and as trust and time goes on, the documentation is not always as thorough as it is for short-term patients. Document the rationale for decreasing or increasing dosages or changing medications even if it is brief. Document the treatment plan with the objective for caring for the patient, treating the underlying condition causing the pain, and addressing the pain.
It is critical to be prepared and handle any requests for records or interviews with great care and seek expert attorney and expert witness review at the earliest time.
It is also important to review your office's systems and documentation standards now before any records are requested. Remember, if any complaint is made it is highly likely that records will be requested and patient charts are not usually perfectly documented and the standards
What You Can Learn From One Pain Management Physician's Medical Board Case.
Here is a sample case of a pain management physician that ended up in a Medical Board Accusation being filed against him for unprofessional conduct, gross negligence, repeated negligence, and excessively prescribing to a patient without a proper medical indication in violation of California Business and Profession Code Section 725, 2234(b)(c) or (d), and 2242(a) relating to several patients. This was a highly trained and regarded physician in the field of pain management.
How did this case end up as an Accusation and what can you do to avoid a similar situation?
1. Documentation Issues - Especially With Long Term Patients. The pain management physician had treated each of the patients for over ten (10) years and as trust and time goes on, the documentation is not always as thorough as it is for short-term patients. Document the rationale for decreasing or increasing dosages or changing medications even if it is brief. Document the treatment plan with the objective for caring for the patient, treating the underlying condition causing the pain, and addressing the pain.
Thursday, November 5, 2015
New York Physician Assistant Arrested For Conspiracy To Illegally Prescribe Oxycodone
A
physician assistant, Michael Troyan, who operated two urgent care clinics on
the east end of Long Island was arrested on November 4, 2015 after being
indicted on federal charges of conspiring to illegally distribute oxycodone. At
the time of his arrest, the DEA executed search warrants at these two clinics:
East End Urgent and Primary Care in Riverhead, New York.
The
indictment and public filings allege that between November 2011 and October
2015, physician assistant Troyan with authority to prescribe controlled
substances, issued prescriptions for thousands of oxycodone pills to
co-conspirators for the purpose of illegally re-selling the pills for
cash. PA Troyan was allegedly captured on video in an undercover
operation writing medically unnecessary prescriptions for OxyCodone and
receiving large quantities of cash at his Riverhead medical office for prior
illegal sales. It is alleged that PA Troyan was receiving half of the
profit from the sale of the oxycodone pills.
Attorney Commentary: In a case like this, there was significant investigation before the Indictment and search warrant was executed including surveillance and recording. There are physicians who also worked at these clinics who were hired by the physician assistant to be his supervisors. While those physicians would not have written the prescriptions, they would have some responsibilites as supervising physician. Long Island has had a signficiant heroin addiction problem and the DEA is being aggressive in investigating physicians and advanced care providers who prescribe painkillers.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates
Work: 213-233-2260
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Prosthetic Limb Maker CEO Charged With State Insurance Fraud For Billing Anthem For Prosthetic Arm After Patient Died and Forging Patient's Name on Delivery Slips
Peter
Lira, CEO of Am-Pro Prosthetics and Orthotics in Whittier, was arrested on
three felony counts of insurance fraud in Los Angeles County Superior Court for
allegedly billing Anthem Blue Cross for a $170,000 prosthetic arm for a Los
Angeles County Public Defender who died of cancer after Mr. Lira was
notified the patient had died. Mr. Lira was released on bond pending trial on
these charges.
Mr. Lira is presumed innocent unless and until he is proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. These are only charges at this time.
The
Department of Insurance alleges that detectives found evidence that Mr. Lira
allegedly submitted fraudulent invoices and forged the deceased patient's
signature on the delivery receipt to collect payment for manufacturing a
prosthetic arm even though the patient has died. The Department of
Insurance also alleges that Mr. Lira is believed to have changed the
circumstances under which the arm was needed, claiming the man was still alive
and needed the limb because of an industrial accident.
Suspecting
fraud, Anthem referred the claim to the Department of Insurance for
investigation. This case is being prosecuted by the Los Angeles County District
Attorney's Office. Mr. Lira faces a maximum exposure of five years in prison,
if convicted on all counts.
Attorney
Commentary:
There are times where billing for medical equipment could occur if a patient
has died between the time of the order and delivery. In addition, there are
times when billing mistakes occur. Statistically, that is the case.
In
this matter, the Prosecution needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr.
Lira personally had “intent” to defraud. This is why there are allegations that
the deceased patient’s signature was “forged” and that the “reason” the arm was
needed was changed.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Office: 213-233-2260
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
DISCLAIMER
DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.




