Over the past seven years, there has been increased investigations on illegal drug diversion at pharmacies and the sale of counterfeit prescription medications at pharmacies. There have been companies and individuals which have been accused of buying back prescription medications from patients and selling them to distributors who create false records of authenticity or selling them to pharmacies at a reduced price.
In a recent California Pharmacy Board case, the Board sought and obtained an Interim Suspension Order against a pharmacy, Adams Square Pharmacy in Glendale, California, arising from the pharmacy returning counterfeit Cialis to Eli Lilly through a pharmaceutical reverse distributor. This was pursuant to Business and Profession Code Section 494(a)(2) on the grounds that the pharmacy posed a danger to the public health, safety and welfare. the judge also found that the return of the counterfeit Cialis was dishonesty, fraud or deceit. Here is a copy of the decision on the interim order. The order shut down the pharmacy. The order also precludes the pharmacist owner Margarita Kazarian from working as a pharmacist in charge. The Los Angeles Times also reported on this matter. The Pharmacy Board has indicated that it will file an Accusation against Ms. Kazarian by July 1, 2014.
The primary ground for the suspension was that the pharmacy had counterfeit Cialis tablets in its stock. This was discovered when the Cialis returned by the pharmacy was found to be counterfeit Lilly drug product and were returned in a genuine Lilly packaging and container. The Pharmacy Board conducted an inspection on November 11, 2013 and found more counterfeit Cialis in the pharmacy and numerous other Pharmacy Board violations.
Pharmacies need to be vigilant in their ordering and be careful when ordering from distributors who are selling trade name drugs at prices below the manufacturers. There are currently federal criminal cases filed throughout the country regarding the operation of businesses dealing in counterfeit drugs or drugs that have been recycles through the system through pharmacies or patients. In the Los Angeles area, there were groups who bought prescription drugs from patients and then repackaged them with fake certificates and resold them into the stream of commerce. This is considered illegal drug diversion.
Pharmacies should check their stock, their suppliers and make sure this does not happen to them. In addition, the pharmacies should be ready for inspections without the issues that this pharmacy faced which included failing to maintain adequate records of sales, disposition, and acquisition of medications; expired medications on the shelf; overfilled containers; etc. This is also considered unprofessional conduct.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Phone: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greenassoc.com
Thoughts And Articles From Tracy Green, Attorney At Green and Associates, Who Represents Professionals, Businesses and Individuals In Administrative, Criminal Defense, Regulatory, Health Care and Civil Litigation Matters In California
Friday, June 20, 2014
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Did Your Office Receive OIG Or Grand Jury Subpoena For Records? Case Example Of Why You Should Not Destroy Records Unless You Want Obstruction Of Justice Charge.
I receive many calls from businesses and individuals where
the government - federal, state, or administrative boards - or insurance
companies are requesting records. Some records are requested for an
audit. Other records are requested by a subpoena or grand jury
subpoena.
A recent case shows what can happen when records are destroyed. On June 11, 2014, a New Jersey
chiropractor, Mary Jean Negri, DC, RN, admitted destroying patient appointment records sought by
federal agents investigating potential billing fraud at her medical office. Dr. Degri DC pleaded guilty in federal court to an information charging her with one count of obstructing an
investigation of a health care offense. Dr. Negri DC had been practicing for 24 years and now this will cause her to lose her license and have a federal criminal conviction.
According to documents filed in this
case and her own statements made in court, Dr. Degri DC discovered in May 2012 that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office were investigating her chiropractic corporation for
potentially fraudulent billing practices. Dr. Negri DC suspected that investigators
were interested in obtaining the clinic's patient appointment books as
evidence of potential fraud. In an effort to obstruct the government’s
investigation, she discarded those patient appointment books.
Dr. Negri DC's sentencing is scheduled for September 29, 2014. The maximum sentence on this charge is 5 years, a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss caused by the offense. It is doubtful that she will receive the maximum but the sentence will depend on the judge and the facts and circumstances. There will be significant collateral consequences to Dr. Negri DC as well such as being excluded as a Medicare provider by OIG and discipline to her license including revocation.
Do not let your office respond to subpoenas or request for records in a manner that exposes you to greater problems. Seek advice and handle these requests in a professional manner. Even if you need to assert the 5th Amendment or are concerned about billing exposure, remember that not every case investigated is charged but it makes the government's job easier to prove fraudulent intent if there are records destroyed or "lost" in a flood or disaster.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Phone: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greensasoc.com
Monday, June 16, 2014
Los Angeles Doctor Charged With Medicare Fraud For Signing Home Health And Hospice Certifications That Were Not Medically Necessary - OIG Investigations Continue
We can expect to see more health care fraud cases involving home health, hospice, physical therapy and occupational therapy being filed in California. These cases also usually involve marketing of Medicare beneficiaries. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) is investigating old cases and seeking to file them even where the billing was done years ago. A recent case involved billing back from 2006.
On June 3, 2014, an Indictment was filed against Dr. Robert Glazer alleging conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1349, health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1347, and aiding and abetting health care fraud from January 2006 to May 2014. Dr. Glazer is presumed innocent and these are simply allegations in the Indictment. It is alleged that all these certifications for home health, PT and OT and the DME prescriptions resulted in billings to Medicare totaling $33 million which resulted in payments of $22 million. Does this mean that Dr. Glazer received $22 million? Of course not, but in a conspiracy he is liable for the certifications he wrote them and there was not medical necessity.
The Indictment though will show what I see in many health care fraud cases in the Los Angeles area. First, the doctor allegedly used his clinic to provide medically unnecessary certifications for (1) home health services for nursing, physical therapy and occupational therapy, (2) hospice services, and (3) durable medical equipment for power wheelchairs.
Medicare coverage for hospice is limited to situations where it has been medically certified that beneficiaries are terminally ill, have 6 months or less to live, and the beneficiary chose hospice understanding that Medicare will not cover treatment intended to cure the beneficiaries' terminal illnesses.
Second, this case involves the marketing of Medicare beneficiaries. A marketer is alleged to be a co-conspirator who recruited Medicare patients for the home health agency and the medical clinic. Patients allegedly received free diabetic shoes and promises of free power wheelchairs. There is a lot of marketing in hospices and the fees paid to marketers are significant. With marketing, any claim will be a false claim but this case goes beyond pure marketing and kickback issues.
Third, this case involved a manager or hidden owner of the Medicare clinic. The Indictment alleges an owner of home health services (Fifth Avenue Home Health) was a manager alleges that the medical clinic provided unnecessary services. In many of these cases, managers and hidden owners are involved.
These fraud cases take years to find their way to court. For physicians who wrote certifications, they are now being held responsible for the billings of third party home health agencies, hospices and DME companies. In some of these cases, the DME companies have been prosecuted and now the government is coming back to charge the physicians, especially now that the individuals who have plead guilty or been convicted are cooperating.
OIG Investigations. If the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has come to your office and requested files by subpoena or request, there is a pending criminal investigation. I have seen many providers not take these subpoenas or investigations seriously and let themselves and their staff interviewed. After a year or two, medical providers may think that these cases have gone away but then find that the investigations are still ongoing.
It is important to seek expert advice early on in these cases in order to evaluate the legal issues. In some cases, where there is a good defense it may be critical to hire an expert early and present this evidence to OIG or the U.S. Attorney's Office in order to prevent cases from being filed. In other cases, there may be reasons to not disclose this information or evidence and wait to see whether or not charges will be filed. There are many other ways to proceed since each case is different. It is important to have knowledge and understand the allegations, the billing issues and why there is an investigation. This also allows medical providers to plan ahead.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
800 West 6th Street, Suite 450
Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greenassoc.com
On June 3, 2014, an Indictment was filed against Dr. Robert Glazer alleging conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1349, health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1347, and aiding and abetting health care fraud from January 2006 to May 2014. Dr. Glazer is presumed innocent and these are simply allegations in the Indictment. It is alleged that all these certifications for home health, PT and OT and the DME prescriptions resulted in billings to Medicare totaling $33 million which resulted in payments of $22 million. Does this mean that Dr. Glazer received $22 million? Of course not, but in a conspiracy he is liable for the certifications he wrote them and there was not medical necessity.
The Indictment though will show what I see in many health care fraud cases in the Los Angeles area. First, the doctor allegedly used his clinic to provide medically unnecessary certifications for (1) home health services for nursing, physical therapy and occupational therapy, (2) hospice services, and (3) durable medical equipment for power wheelchairs.
Medicare coverage for hospice is limited to situations where it has been medically certified that beneficiaries are terminally ill, have 6 months or less to live, and the beneficiary chose hospice understanding that Medicare will not cover treatment intended to cure the beneficiaries' terminal illnesses.
Second, this case involves the marketing of Medicare beneficiaries. A marketer is alleged to be a co-conspirator who recruited Medicare patients for the home health agency and the medical clinic. Patients allegedly received free diabetic shoes and promises of free power wheelchairs. There is a lot of marketing in hospices and the fees paid to marketers are significant. With marketing, any claim will be a false claim but this case goes beyond pure marketing and kickback issues.
Third, this case involved a manager or hidden owner of the Medicare clinic. The Indictment alleges an owner of home health services (Fifth Avenue Home Health) was a manager alleges that the medical clinic provided unnecessary services. In many of these cases, managers and hidden owners are involved.
These fraud cases take years to find their way to court. For physicians who wrote certifications, they are now being held responsible for the billings of third party home health agencies, hospices and DME companies. In some of these cases, the DME companies have been prosecuted and now the government is coming back to charge the physicians, especially now that the individuals who have plead guilty or been convicted are cooperating.
OIG Investigations. If the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has come to your office and requested files by subpoena or request, there is a pending criminal investigation. I have seen many providers not take these subpoenas or investigations seriously and let themselves and their staff interviewed. After a year or two, medical providers may think that these cases have gone away but then find that the investigations are still ongoing.
It is important to seek expert advice early on in these cases in order to evaluate the legal issues. In some cases, where there is a good defense it may be critical to hire an expert early and present this evidence to OIG or the U.S. Attorney's Office in order to prevent cases from being filed. In other cases, there may be reasons to not disclose this information or evidence and wait to see whether or not charges will be filed. There are many other ways to proceed since each case is different. It is important to have knowledge and understand the allegations, the billing issues and why there is an investigation. This also allows medical providers to plan ahead.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
800 West 6th Street, Suite 450
Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greenassoc.com
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Ex-Controller Of California Court Services Firm With Gambling Addiction Admits Embezzling $3.3 Million And Pleads Guilty In Federal Court
I receive many calls from businesses and individuals where
the government - federal, state, or administrative boards - or insurance
companies are requesting records. Some records are requested for an
audit. Other records are requested by a subpoena or grand jury
subpoena.
A recent case shows what can happen when records are destroyed. On June 11, 2014, a New Jersey
chiropractor, Mary Jean Negri, DC, RN, admitted destroying patient appointment records sought by
federal agents investigating potential billing fraud at her medical office. Dr. Degri DC pleaded guilty in federal court to an information charging her with one count of obstructing an
investigation of a health care offense. Dr. Negri DC had been practicing for 24 years and now this will cause her to lose her license and have a federal criminal conviction.
According to documents filed in this
case and her own statements made in court, Dr. Degri DC discovered in May 2012 that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office were investigating her chiropractic corporation for
potentially fraudulent billing practices. Dr. Negri DC suspected that investigators
were interested in obtaining the clinic's patient appointment books as
evidence of potential fraud. In an effort to obstruct the government’s
investigation, she discarded those patient appointment books.
Dr. Negri DC's sentencing is scheduled for September 29, 2014. The maximum sentence on this charge is 5 years, a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss caused by the offense. It is doubtful that she will receive the maximum but the sentence will depend on the judge and the facts and circumstances. There will be significant collateral consequences to Dr. Negri DC as well such as being excluded as a Medicare provider by OIG and discipline to her license including revocation.
Do not let your office respond to subpoenas or request for records in a manner that exposes you to greater problems. Seek advice and handle these requests in a professional manner. Even if you need to assert the 5th Amendment or are concerned about billing exposure, remember that not every case investigated is charged but it makes the government's job easier to prove fraudulent intent if there are records destroyed or "lost" in a flood or disaster.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Phone: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greensasoc.com
Sunday, June 8, 2014
California Medical Board Will Be Revising Pain Management Guidelines - Prescribing Task Force Meeting on June 19, 2014
On June 19, 2014, the California Medical Board's Prescribing Task Force will be meeting in Sacramento. On the agenda will be revision of the Medical Board's Pain Management Guidelines.
For those physicians and groups who specialize in pain management, this will be an important meeting in order to have input into revisions to these guidelines. These guidelines will ultimately be part of the standard of care.
For more information, including speaking at the meeting, contact the Medical Board at 916-263-2389.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Phone: 213-233-2260
For those physicians and groups who specialize in pain management, this will be an important meeting in order to have input into revisions to these guidelines. These guidelines will ultimately be part of the standard of care.
For more information, including speaking at the meeting, contact the Medical Board at 916-263-2389.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Phone: 213-233-2260
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
76 Year Old Los Angeles Chiropractor Accused of Sexually Assaulting A Patient - What Can You Learn From This?
On June 3, 2014, the Los Angeles Times reported that a 76 year old chiropractor -- practicing for 40 years -- was arrested of sexually assaulting a patient. Manuel Domingo Chacon was arrested and was held on $100,000 bail but it should be remembered that these are accusations and he is presumed innocent.
While we do not know the facts of this case, it is a reminder that a "sexual assault" or "sexual touching" allegation is very difficult to defend. My recommendation is for there to be a chaperon in the room where patient are seen. The doors should remain open unless there is a chaperon there.
I often have clients claim they cannot afford it but I recommend having a low skilled medical assistant who can assist with charts and who can enter in each chart their presence during the examination. I have had clients careers harmed by allegations much less serious than a rape or sexual assault. I have seen medical providers of brushing up against the outside of someone's clothing for a second. I have seen a physician accused of brushing up his clothed groin area against a patient while performing a laser procedure.
It is not only criminal allegations that are the concern. If a patient makes that complaint to a Medical, Chiropractic, Pharmacy, Behavioral Science or other Board, those Boards will almost always let them go to hearing and let a judge decide the validity of the allegation.
As part of your best practices, consider making this change in your practice. In today's world, it is easy for someone to make a false claim in the hopes of getting a settlement or if they have psychiatric or other psychological problems that could add to the issue. Make sure any inappropriate comments by patients are charted and if there are patients who have boundary issues, consider discharging those patients from your practice (while following all the rules and precautions in discharging them). Be safe out there and be healthily paranoid.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Phone: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greenassoc.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
DISCLAIMER
DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.
The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.
Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.




