Monday, November 29, 2021

San Joaquin County Doctor Convicted of Prescribing Opioids Without Medical Necessity to Patients in Federal Court


The problem with physicians prescribing opioid drugs to patients where there is not a proper medical and prescription history taken, lack of a proper medical examination to confirm the legitimacy of patients' pain complaints, and failure to assess the risk of addiction issues continues. 

On November 19, 2021, Dr. Edmund Kemprud, age 78, was convicted in Sacramento  federal court of 14 counts of illegally prescribing opioids and other controlled substances to patients. As is common in these cases, undercover officers went to his office in order to obtain evidence that would substantiate the charges. Usually pain medication patients do not want to testify against their physicians so undercover operations are common. 

According to evidence presented at trial, Dr. Kemprud was a physician licensed to practice medicine in California and worked in several locations around the East Bay and Central Valley. One of the more inflamatory allegations was that one of the offices was in the back room of a nail salon and medi-spa in Tracy, California. 

Dr. Kemprud prescribed commonly abused prescription drugs, including Hydrocodone, Alprazolam, and Oxycodone. The government introduced evidence that certain prescriptions were outside the usual course of professional practice and not for legitimate medical purpose. 

The government introduced evidence at trial showing that Dr. Kemprud ignored "red flags" which are indications that his patients were addicts or that they were diverting the drugs during the undercover patient visits. Dr. Kemprud charged $79 a visit and the evidence was that he often spent less than five minutes with a patient and would see 30 patients in less than a day. In family practice, those numbers are not unusual for follow up visits but when prescriptions for serious pain medications are being written -- a more extensive visit is expected.

There was evidence that several pharmacies were so troubled by Dr. Kemprud’s prescriptions that they instituted companywide policies to block his prescriptions. In addition, trial testimony of undercover officers established that on 14 occasions between Sept. 6, 2018, and March 13, 2019, Dr. Kemprud prescribed opioids without determining the patients’ medical and prescription histories, without conducting a proper medical examination, without confirming the legitimacy of the patients’ complaints, and without assessing the risk of aberrant drug behavior.

The California Medical Board has a publication for the guidelines for prescribing controlled substances and any and all providers should be compliant with it before prescribing any controlled substance. In addition, the requirements for CURES reports must also be met.

Attorney Commentary: The sentencing of Dr. Kemprud is scheduled on February 14, 2022 and the court will have discretion after consideration of statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The age of Dr. Kemprud may be a factor but I have seen 78 year old clients receive heavy sentences. Often the federal judges can be older and do not view the fact that someone is in their 70s to be a mitigating factor. 

However, I have seen cognitive decline among older physicians who do not retire when they should have and fail to recognize the need for complying with the standard of care of a pain management physician. Times have changed considerably in the last 10 years and ignorance of the changing standards of practice is not a very strong defense.

When a physician prescribes without medical necessity or by following the standard of care, the protection for prescribing controlled substances provided by the DEA license is taken away. 

Posted by Green and Associates

 


DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.