Thursday, January 9, 2020

Former California Physician Sentenced to 2 Years in Federal Prison for Defrauding Medicare by Prescribing Unnecessary Home Health Services for Kickbacks and Illegally Prescribing Opioid Drugs


Physicians who order home health where it is not medically necessary can be charged with Medicare fraud. If that same physician orders medications, especially controlled substances, without seeing the patient on a regular basis, that can be another ground for a fraud charge. 

The loss amounts can be huge since the physician will be held responsible for the total amount of billings by the home health agency and the pharmacy's prescriptions. A recent case illustrates a physician who ordered home health in exchange for payments and then also prescribed some pain medications that were medically unnecessary.  

On January 6, 2020, Kain Kumar, a former doctor, was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison after having pleaded guilty in April 2019 to one count of health care fraud and one count of distribution of hydrocodone. Mr. Kumar practiced internal medicine, maintained medical offices in Palmdale, Rosamond, and Ridgecrest, California and surrendered his medical license last year.

He was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Mr. Kumar was also ordered to pay financial penalties totaling more than $1 million, consisting of $509,365 in restitution, $494,900 in asset forfeiture, and a $72,000 fine.

In the plea agreement, Mr. Kumar admitted that from February 2011 until May 2016, he defrauded the Medicare health care benefit program by prescribing unnecessary home health services in exchange for the payment of illegal kickbacks to him from a La Verne-based home health agency called Star Home Health Resources, Inc. 

According to the indictment in this case, Medicare allegedly paid $4,398,599 to Star based on the illegal kickback-tainted referrals from Mr. Kumar which is greater than the restitution amount ordered which is one of the benefits of entering a guilty plea where the facts are damaging since the sentencing guidelines vary depending on the restitution loss amount.  

In the plea, Mr. Kumar admitted that he caused false and fraudulent claims for reimbursement to be submitted to Medicare for Medicare beneficiaries that he did not personally examine or for patients he only briefly examined. Mr. Kumar admitted that he also prescribed drugs that were not medically necessary and which were paid for by the Medicare Part D program.

In addition, Mr. Kumar admitted in his plea agreement that between February 2013 and January 2016, that he – without a legitimate medical purpose – prescribed 23,826 pills of the opioid drug hydrocodone (commonly sold under the brand name Vicodin or Norco) and 38,459 pills of the muscle-relaxer carisoprodol (sold under the brand name Soma). 

Mr. Kumar admitted that he directed his office staff – who were not medical professionals – to issue prescriptions for these drugs to patients even though Mr. Kumar had not examined the patients. Mr. Kumar admitted that he directed his office staff to sign his name on prescriptions for opioid drugs and also provided his staff with pre-signed prescriptions. In one instance, although Mr. Kumar examined a patient only once on the patient’s very first visit, and thereafter he caused prescriptions to be issued to the patient for hydrocodone and carisoprodol on a monthly basis for approximately a year and a half even though Mr. Kumar did not actually see the patient for any subsequent physician examination.

This case is the fifth one involving Star Home Health. Previously, Elaine C. Lat, Star’s chief operating officer and the case’s lead defendant, was sentenced to a 30-month prison sentence after pleading guilty in May 2017 to one count of conspiracy and four counts of paying illegal kickbacks. Three other defendants, including Ms. Lat’s parents, each pleaded guilty to criminal charges and were also sentenced in this matter.

Attorney Commentary:  Physicians need to be very careful in ordering home health for patients. If it is deemed not medically necessary, the physician can be liable civilly or criminally for health care fraud. If the physician is paid anything by the home health agency, then the home health billing is automatically deemed a false claim. Home health agencies approach physicians and offer them medical directorships or other sham arrangements in order to hide the kickbacks but that approach can often lead the physician into legal issues.  Home health agencies see other businesses offering the same type of arrangements and assume that it must be kosher, but it is generally not. 

Any compensation arrangements between a physcian and home health should be reviewed by an experience attorney and there should be an opinion letter issued on the matter where all the facts have been disclosed to the attorney. Comments to the physician such as "we will expect 5 or 6 referrals a month"  should immediately raise a red flag.

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.