Friday, November 8, 2019

Sugar Daddy Website Users: Pay Attention. San Diego Attorney Who Used Site Has Entered Federal Guilty Plea to Enticing and Coercing a Female to Engage in Prostitution.


Sugar Daddy websites that offer a “mutually beneficial relationship” are being investigated as part of human trafficking when they involve minors and young women. A recent case, has a San Diego attorney pleading guilty which will probably lead to prison time and potential loss of bar license. 

I hope this case causes people to think twice about the nature of these websites and how vulnerable young women can be lured to them. Professionals especially should be very careful since they are held to a higher level of conduct. This case did not involve an agent posing as a young woman but an actual minor female who claimed to be 18 year's old but was still in high school.  

On October 30, 2019, San Diego attorney William David Turley plead guilty in federal court to enticing and coercing a female to engage in prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a). U.S.D.C., So Dist, CA, Case No. 18-CR-4574-AJB.

According to his plea agreement, on or about April 30, 2018, Mr. Turley began communicating with an adult female victim whom he met on the website sugardaddymeet.com. Mr. Turley and the victim discussed entering into a “mutually beneficial relationship,” meaning that Mr. Turley would provide the victim with financial support and the victim would provide companionship for and engage in sexual acts with Mr. Turley.


On or about May 3, 2018, Mr. Turley persuaded, induced, and enticed the victim to take a flight from a city in California to Las Vegas, Nevada to meet with him. Mr. Turley paid for the victim’s flight and other travel expenses. At the time the victim boarded the flight in California, she understood that she was traveling to Las Vegas to engage in sexual acts with Mr. Turley in exchange for monetary compensation. In Las Vegas, Mr. Turley provided the victim with between $1,500 and $1,800 in cash, and Mr. Turley and the victim engaged in sexual intercourse.

The plea agreement also states that on or about May 12, 2018, Mr. Turley began communicating with the female victim via sugardaddymeet.com. In conversations with the minor victim, they discussed that she was 18 years old. But he was aware that she was a high school student, that she could not meet on weekends because she was grounded, and that her parents had taken her cellphone away due to poor performance in school.

On or about May 15, 2018, the victim walked from her high school across the street to a library where Mr. Turley was waiting. Mr. Turley took the minor victim to a Boba tea shop nearby.

On or about May 16, 2018, Mr. Turley met the victim at the library after school and drove her to a store where Turley purchased the minor victim a cellphone. Mr. Turley then drove the minor victim a short distance, parked the car, and engaged in a sex act with the minor. The victim told Mr. Turley she wanted to stop and needed to get home. Mr. Turley gave the minor victim $300.

Attorney Commentary: These are serious cases. I suspect it got the attention of federal authorities when he had the female fly to Las Vegas to meet him. There are women who get lured to Las Vegas in human trafficking and never make it back home. This was not that type of case but there are young women especially those who are in the foster care system, are from disadvantaged homes or who have family disputes during the teen years who fall prey to someone willing to support them. When I say serious, look at the potential sentence. The maximum penalty in this case is twenty (20) years in prison and a $250,000 fine. 

One of the reasons Mr. Turley must have plead is due to the plea agreement not alleging that she was a minor and to seek benefits of cooperation and downward departures in sentencing. The San Diego Human Trafficking Task Force investigated this case.  

Presently, Mr. Turley is scheduled to be sentenced before U.S. District Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on March 2, 2020 at 9 a.m. but this could be continued.




DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.