Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Why Are Older Physicians More At Risk for Criminal Prescribing Charges? Recent Case: Older Santa Rosa Doctor Indicted For Unlawfully Prescribing Fentanyl And Oxycodone

I often see older physicians caught up in criminal prescribing cases. Part of it may due to impairment and part of it may be due to trusting others including patients. Older physicians need to seriously question their conduct and business arrangements since failure to follow the standard of care can be criminal if it involves scheduled drugs. The standard of care for pain management has changed drastically the last 10 years and the record keeping requirements have also increased.  

A recent case illustrates this issue. On October 2, 2018, a federal grand jury indictment against Santa Rosa neurologist Thomas Keller, age 72, was unsealed charging him with distributing Schedule II and IV controlled substances outside the scope of his professional practice and without a legitimate medical need. Dr. Keller was also charged with two counts of health care fraud related to billing. An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and Dr. Keller, like all defendants, is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

According to the indictment filed September 27, 2018, and unsealed on October 2, 2018,  in June of 2017, Dr. Keller, 72, of Santa Rosa, was a licensed physician when he knowingly distributed Oxycodone to a person knowing that the distribution was outside the scope of his professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.  

The indictment further alleged that in March of 2018, Dr. Keller allegedly distributed Tramadol to another person, again knowing the distribution was outside the scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose. Then, in July of 2018, the indictment alleges, Dr. Keller distributed fentanyl to a different person knowing the distribution was outside the scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.  In addition, Dr. Keller is accused of submitting two fraudulent health care claims for payment as follows: one to Anthem Blue Cross of California in March of 2018, and the other to Medi-Cal in July of 2015. 

In sum, Dr. Keller is charged with three counts of distributing drugs outside the scope of professional practice, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), and two counts of health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347.  This prosecution is the result of investigations by the DEA, FBI, HHS-OIG, and the California Department of Justice, Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse. Dr. Keller is next scheduled to appear next before the Honorable Judge Vince Chhabria on Tuesday October 16, 2018.

The maximum sentences for these charges are high. However, the maximum is usually not imposed and any sentence following a conviction (by trial or guilty plea) would be imposed by a federal judge after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553. However, the maximum sentences show the seriousness of these type of charges and why physicians need to be very careful when prescribing pain management drugs.

The maximum sentences are as follows: If convicted, Dr. Keller faces a maximum sentence of 20 years imprisonment and a fine of $1,000,000, for the distribution of fentanyl and Oxycodone.  If convicted, Dr. Keller also faces a maximum statutory sentence of five years in prison and $250,000 for the distribution of Tramadol.  In addition, if convicted, Keller faces 10 years in prison and $250,000 (or twice the gain or loss) for each violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.  Additional fines, restitution, and additional periods of supervised release also could be ordered at sentencing.  

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.