Thursday, August 2, 2018

California Meat Processing Company and Two Company Officials Plead Guilty to Selling Misbranded Beef, Pork and Poultry They Falsely Claimed Had Been Inspected


Regulatory cases can turn criminal and the resolution often takes years. A recent case began on the regulatory side in 2012 and became a criminal case which has taken six years to resolve. The case has also cost the company millions of dollars in product seizures, recall requirements, legal fees and fines. It shows the potential risk of non-compliance.

On August 1, 2018, a meat processor Golden Key Food, Inc. dba AA Meat Products Corp. was investigated in 2012 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for selling meat that was produced without federal inspection. The government alleged that AA Meat products had a plant in Maywood that was operating under a USDA grant of inspection where meat and poultry food products were properly federally inspected, but that they had a second facility in Commerce did not have USDA inspection grant. USDA alleged that AA Meat produced and sold meat (such as trip, duck feet, and other less expensive parts) from its Commerce plant that had not been inspected but was stamped as if it had been inspected.

In 2012, the USDA investigators came in and seized approximately 568,000 pounds of meat and poultry products. The USDA then issued a Class I recall led to the recovery of another nearly one-half million pounds of meat – all of which had to be destroyed.

A Class I recall, according to court documents, is based on a “health hazard situation where there is a reasonable probability that the use of the product will cause serious, adverse health consequences, or death.” AA Meat voluntarily participated in the massive Class I recall to protect public safety. It does not appear that there were any illnesses or injuries to consumers.
  
The case was also pursued criminally. The resolution was probably the best that could be reached since it guaranteed misdemeanor pleas (with a good possibility for no jail time) for the owner of the company and his wife who was also a plant manager. AA Meat pleaded guilty to a felony offense of offering to sell misbranded meat, specifically beef tripe, with the intent to defraud. The owner Bai Zhi Yan pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts of offering to sell misbranded meat (pork uteri) and poultry products (duck feet); and Yan’s wife, Lianjie Kitty Jiang, pleaded guilty to the same counts as her husband.

In the plea agreement, federal prosecutors have agreed to recommend that the company AA Meat be sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay a $1 million fine. AA Meat has agreed to be subject to a food safety compliance plan. As for Mr. Yan and Mrs. Jiang, prosecutors will recommend a sentence of two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, as well as a $20,000 fine for Mrs. Jiang and a $5,000 fine for Mr. Yan.

The three defendants pleaded guilty before United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner, who ordered the defendants to appear for sentencing on September 17, 2018 and he will consider the prosecutor’s recommendation but the sentence is ultimately his decision.

Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.