Sunday, May 27, 2018

Northern California Pain Management Doctors Agree To Pay $260,000 To Settle Civil Claims Following DEA Inspection Regarding Adequacy of Controlled Substances Records


Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) inspections can have significant financial repercussions if the logs and records of controlled substances are not properly maintained. A recent case illustrates how this happens and is a reminder for practices and pharmacies to be sure their business is compliant in this regard.  

In January 2014, the DEA inspected the controlled substance ordering and dispensing records relating to Pain Medicine Consultants, Inc., a medical practice which had offices in multiple Bay Area locations (Novato, Pleasant Hill, and Pleasanton). 

The government alleged that the DEA inspection uncovered multiple violations of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 by the practice and the physicians in the group who have the DEA registrationsThe government specifically alleged that between January 10, 2012, through January 17, 2014, the medical practice and the physicians failed to:

(1) keep and maintain adequate records pertaining to controlled substances, as required by 21 C.F.R. § 1304, et seq.; 

(2) failed to include the address of the patient on controlled substance prescriptions that they each issued as required by 21 C.F.R. § 1306.05(a); and 

(3) exceeded the authority of their registrations by filling a prescription for a controlled substance, in violation of 21 C.F.R. § 1306.06.

Now, five years' later, the physicians in the group decided to settle the matter with the U.S. Department of Justice. Thus, on May 18, 2019, physicians Drs. William Longton, Ruben Kalra, and Richard Shinaman agreed to collectively pay $260,000 to settle allegations that they failed to keep and maintain adequate records and other allegations pertaining to controlled substances at their practice Pain Medicine Consultants, Inc. 

This is a civil case and not criminal and the settlement will help resolve all civil claims related to the violations identified in the investigation. DEA violations can subject a practice to fines and they can add up quickly over the course of years. For this reason, it is a wise idea for the records to be maintained properly and that compliance be revisited on a regular basis. A settlement such as this one also helps avoid an administrative case that could result in a loss of DEA certificate privileges.  

Green and Associates


DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.