Friday, March 9, 2018

Former Dept of Justice Attorney Sentenced To 30 Months For Obtaining Information About Companies Named in Qui Tam Lawsuits and Using That Information in Private Practice.


Sometimes clients will believe that by hiring attorneys who have just left the government, they can obtain confidential information. While those attorneys have relationships with the other attorneys and agents, they have strict ethical rules where they cannot use information from a case they worked on in private practice. 

In an unusual and sad case, former Department of Justice attorney Jeffrey Wertkin was sentenced on March 7. 2018 to 30 months in prison for obstruction of justice and transportation of stolen property following a guilty plea last November relating to his "theft" of confidential information and documents on cases he personally was not working on and using it to obtain private clients.    

According to his plea agreement, Mr. Wertkin of Washington, D.C., worked for the Civil Fraud Section of the Department of Justice from October 24, 2010, until April 12, 2016. During that time, he worked on qui tam actions pursuant to which the government investigated companies suspected of breaking the law.  

Federal courts often order qui tam complaints “sealed” and therefore kept from public view until it is appropriate for the complaints to become public.  In his plea agreement, Mr. Wertkin admitted that during the last month of his employment as a trial attorney with the Department of Justice, he began secretly reviewing and collecting sealed qui tam complaints that were not assigned to him.  


Further, Mr. Wertkin has admitted that after he left the Department of Justice, he used the stolen information improperly to solicit clients that were the subject of the sealed complaints. Mr.  Wertkin acknowledged that in one instance, he was successful in using the information from a sealed complaint to convince the company that it was the subject of a lawsuit and to retain him as an attorney to represent it in the lawsuit.  Mr. Wertkin also acknowledged he lied to the Department of Justice in documents he completed during his exit process regarding whether he stole the complaints.

The plea agreement also describes two occasions in which Mr. Wertkin attempted to sell information to companies that were the subject of government investigations.  On November 30, 2016, Mr. Wertkin offered to sell a complaint to the corporation named in the lawsuit.  Then, between November 30, 2016, and January 31, 2017, Mr. Wertkin engaged in multiple conversations with a representative of the corporation to negotiate the sale of the sealed complaint for $310,000.   

Similarly, on January 23, 2017, Wertkin contacted a second corporation and offered to mail to the representative a copy of the face sheet of the complaint.  Wertkin actually mailed a redacted copy of the face sheet and promised that, for a fee, he would provide the entire complaint.

Mr. Wertkin was arrested on January 31, 2017, after traveling from the Washington, D.C. Area to the San Francisco Bay Area with a copy of a sealed complaint.  On that day, Mr. Wertkin believed he was meeting at a Cupertino hotel with a representative from a company and that he was exchanging the complaint for a duffel bag filled with $310,000. In truth, Wertkin was meeting with an undercover employee of the FBI. 

Mr. Wertkin described the meeting in his sentencing memorandum as follows: “As part of his escapist fantasy, Mr. Wertkin donned a wig and sunglasses and went to a hotel in Sunnyvale with complaint in hand, whereupon he was arrested by the FBI.” 
Further, Mr. Wertkin admitted that after his arrest, he took steps in an effort to obstruct the ongoing criminal investigation.  Specifically, after being released from custody, Mr. Wertkin returned to his office, purportedly to retrieve his personal belongings, and removed and destroyed documents from his office that he knew could further incriminate him.  

Mr. Wertkin also acknowledged he “placed two complaints in a used FedEx envelope in an attempt to make it appear that sealed complaints had been accidentally mailed to him by a DOJ employee.”  Mr. Wertkin acknowledged he took these and additional other steps in an effort to corruptly obstruct the ongoing investigation and proceedings against him.

Mr. Wertkin decided to plea and on November 1, 2017, Mr. Wertkin was charged by information with two counts of obstruction of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505, and one count of interstate transportation of stolen goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Pursuant to his plea agreement, Wertkin pleaded guilty to all counts.  

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.