If you are a
Medicare provider (physician or supplier) you will be audited. The issue
is when and why? CMS has recently released some data that Medicare providers
and health care lawyers, accountants and consultants should review to
understand where they and their clients stand with respect to other providers
who bill the same procedure codes for Medicare Part B, fee-for-service (not
HMO).
Do you remember the old Avis car rental ads about "We're No. 2 . . . so pick us because we try harder?" Well, in the Medicare world it is not good to be Number 1, 2 or 3 or anything that is above the bell curve. If your company or group is, you will be targeted for an audit. You can provide incredible quality of care, have great records and impeccable credentials but if you are billing higher for your specialty that the norm or are billing more than others in the same zip code, that is a typical ground for an audit.
How can you tell
where you as a provider falls? For calendar year 2012, you can search the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) database. CMS claims it released this information “to make our healthcare
system more transparent, affordable, and accountable.” CMS allows you to download the entire file in
Excel format.
CMS has prepared a public data set entitled “theMedicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other SupplierPublic Use File.” For short, let’s call it “CMS 2012 Physician and Other
Supplier PUF.” It contains information on:
(1) utilization;
(2) payment (allowed amount and Medicare payment);
and
(3) submitted charges.
It is organized by (a) National Provider
Identifier (NPI), (b) Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code,
and (c) place of service. You can therefore search by codes and zip code to see
where you or your client will fall.
The New York Times has taken this same data and
created a searchable database aimed at the consumer in an article entitled “How Much Medicare Pays For Your Doctor’s Care?” This means that in a quick glance,
anyone can see how much Medicare paid you or your business in 2012. This means
employees, competitors, patients, marketers, ex-spouses, and so on. It also has the provider’s address. Be prepared for others to discover this
information. The NYT also had an article outing some of the physicians who received the largest payments. Privacy as we used to know it does not exist. I am still in shock that CMS prepared the
information in this way and released this information without respecting some
element of financial privacy.
Commentary:
Information is power. Use this to your own advantage and see where you
land and understand that if you are high on the curve for your specialty, HCPCS
codes or zip code, then you are more likely to be audited or targeted. You may even have private insurance companies
evaluating you once they know your Medicare numbers. If there are good reasons for your office
being higher than the norm, be prepared to demonstrate to Medicare and the
carriers the reasons.
I have been to numerous audits where the auditors frankly told my provider client that they should work on staying under the top of the bell curve in order to avoid future audits. If that will not work for your office, make sure your practice or company is audit ready, documentation is well done and will pass an audit. Medicare fee-for-service is great for cash flow but it is useless if there will be overpayments and money has to be paid back due to illegible charts, missing procedure notes, evaluation and management notes that do not support the level of service billed even though the time was spent. Auditing does not consider quality of care. It looks at whether the records support the services billed.
I have been to numerous audits where the auditors frankly told my provider client that they should work on staying under the top of the bell curve in order to avoid future audits. If that will not work for your office, make sure your practice or company is audit ready, documentation is well done and will pass an audit. Medicare fee-for-service is great for cash flow but it is useless if there will be overpayments and money has to be paid back due to illegible charts, missing procedure notes, evaluation and management notes that do not support the level of service billed even though the time was spent. Auditing does not consider quality of care. It looks at whether the records support the services billed.
Posted by Tracy Green, Esq.
Green and Associates, Attorneys at Law
Phone: 213-233-2260
Email: tgreen@greenassoc.com
Website: www.greenassoc.com