Monday, June 11, 2018

After Losing At Trial, Mississippi Physician Sentenced to 42 Months in Prison for Role in Prescribing Allegedly Medically Unnecessary Compounded Medications to Patients and for Falsifying Patient Records to Make it Appear He Had Examined Them Before Prescribing

Physicians who consider "telemedicine" or writing prescriptions to patients they have not physically seen or any other unusual arrangement for seeing patients and prescribing medications or supplies should consider a recent case. 

In this case, a 78 year old Mississippi physician, Albert Diaz, M.D., went to trial after the key people in the compounding pharmacy and marketing plead guilty. I often see older or impaired physicians get brought into these arrangements and this case fits the pattern.

On March 2, 2018, after a five-day jury trial, Albert Diaz, M.D. in the Southern District of Mississippi was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, four counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to distribute and dispense a controlled substance, four counts of distributing and dispensing a controlled substance, one count of conspiracy to falsify records in a federal investigation and five counts of falsification of records in a federal investigation. 

On June 8, 2018, Dr. Diaz was sentenced to 42 months in federal prison and was denied bail pending surrender. According to government evidence presented at trial, between 2014 and 2015, Dr. Diaz participated with others in defrauding TRICARE and other insurance companies by prescribing medically unnecessary compounded medications, some of which included ketamine, a controlled substance, to individuals he had not examined.  The government's trial evidence claimed that, based on the prescriptions signed by Dr. Diaz, Advantage Pharmacy in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, dispensed these medically unnecessary compounded medications and sought and received reimbursement from TRICARE and other insurance companies totaling more than $3 million. 

The government argued that its trial evidence further demonstrated that in response to a TRICARE audit, Dr. Diaz falsified patient records to make it appear as though he had examined patients before prescribing the medications. There was video evidence at trial that also demonstrated Dr. Diaz's plan to not disclose certain information during the audit. It appears that Dr. Diaz's reaction to the audit created evidence that supported criminal intent or intent to defraud. 

Attorney Commentary: Others who plead guilty testified against Dr. Diaz and although they were the ones who created the pharmacy and arrangement, physicians are held to a high standard when they allow their license to be used to help perpetuate a health care fraud. There is even a sentencing enhancement for those who have special skills.  

Even where the physician makes a small fraction of what the pharmacy makes, the physician can be held liable for the entire amount of the billing resulting from his prescription. The loss amounts are based on billing and collections and can result in exposure to long jail sentences. Even a physician such as Dr. Diaz who had a lifetime of law abiding conduct is not spared a sentence in a case such as this.

Physicians and other professionals need to be very careful when they get involved in any "business" arrangement. Older physicians especially who want to stay in the profession but have a "job" where they do not have to supervise an office or run a business need to be careful and overly cautious for those who may use them to further their own business. I have had too many cases where physicians were overly trusting and others used their physician stamp or signature or persuaded them that all was being done properly. Due diligence is key.

DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Green & Associates' articles and blog postings are prepared as a service to the public and are not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Nothing in this website should be construed as legal advice. Green & Associates' articles and blog postings may contain references or links to statutes, regulations, or other policy materials. The information provided is only intended to be a general summary. It is not intended to take the place of either the written law or regulations. We encourage readers to review the specific statutes, regulations, and other interpretive materials for a full and accurate statement of their contents and contact their attorney for legal advice. The primary purpose of this website is not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service and this website is not an advertisement or solicitation. Anyone viewing this web site in a state where the web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state, should disregard this web site.

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to create, and does not create, a lawyer-client relationship with Green & Associates, Attorneys at Law. Sending an e-mail to Tracy Green does not contractually obligate them to represent you as your lawyer, or create any type of client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be formed absent a written engagement or retainer letter agreement signed by both Green & Associates and client and which specifies the scope of the engagement.

Please note that e-mail transmission is not secure unless it is encrypted. E-mail messages sent to Ms. Green should not include confidential or sensitive information.